Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson

[1998] 3 S.C.R. 157

SCC Reasons for Judgment

Facta

Date Document
97 / 02 / 17 Appellant - Canadian Egg Marketing Agency
97 / 04 / 21 Respondents - Pineview Poultry Products Ltd. and Frank Richardson, operating as Northern Poultry
97 / 05 / 15 Intervener - Attorney General of British Columbia
97 / 05 / 16 Intervener - Attorney General of Alberta
97 / 05 / 16 Intervener - Attorney General of Canada
97 / 05 / 16 Intervener - Attorney General of Quebec
97 / 05 / 20 Intervener - Attorney General of Ontario
97 / 05 / 20 Intervener - Commissioner of the Northwest Territories
97 / 05 / 20 Interveners - Council of Canadians and Sierra Legal Defence Fund Society
98 / 02 / 18 Intervener - Alberta Barley Commission
98 / 02 / 20 Appellant (rehearing factum) - Canadian Egg Marketing Agency
98 / 02 / 24 Respondents (reply to the Alberta Barley Commission) - Pineview Poultry Products Ltd. and Frank Richardson, operating as Northern Poultry
98 / 02 / 25 Appellant (reply to the Alberta Barley Commission) - Canadian Egg Marketing Agency
98 / 03 / 06 Respondents (supplemental factum) - Pineview Poultry Products Ltd. and Frank Richardson, operating as Northern Poultry
98 / 03 / 12 Intervener (rehearing factum) - Attorney General of Ontario
98 / 03 / 12 Intervener (supplemental factum) - Attorney General of Quebec
98 / 03 / 13 Intervener (rehearing factum) - Attorney General of British Columbia
98 / 03 / 13 Intervener (rehearing factum) - Attorney General of Canada
98 / 03 / 13 Intervener (supplemental factum) - Commissioner of the Northwest Territories
98 / 03 / 13 Interveners (rehearing factum) - Council of Canadians and Sierra Legal Defence Fund Society